AMD Radeon 760M

AMD Radeon 760M

AMD Radeon 760M: A Comprehensive Overview

The AMD Radeon 760M is a significant entry in the mid-range GPU market, offering a blend of performance and efficiency tailored for gamers and professionals alike. This article delves into its architecture, memory, performance in gaming and professional tasks, energy consumption, and more, providing a thorough understanding of this graphics card.

1. Architecture and Key Features

Architecture Overview

The Radeon 760M is built on AMD's RDNA architecture, which marks a significant leap in performance and efficiency over previous generations. RDNA architecture is designed to maximize performance-per-watt and is optimized for high refresh rates and resolutions.

Manufacturing Technology

The 760M is manufactured using a 7nm process technology, allowing for more transistors on the chip, which enhances performance while minimizing power consumption. This process technology is crucial in delivering improved efficiency, enabling higher clock speeds, and reducing heat output.

Unique Features

While the Radeon 760M does not feature NVIDIA's proprietary technologies like RTX or DLSS, it does support AMD’s FidelityFX, a suite of visual enhancement tools that improve image quality without a significant performance hit. FidelityFX offers features such as Contrast Adaptive Sharpening, Variable Rate Shading, and Screen Space Reflections, which can enhance the gaming experience significantly.

2. Memory Specifications

Memory Type and Size

The Radeon 760M is equipped with GDDR6 memory, which provides higher bandwidth compared to GDDR5. This memory type is critical for handling the increasing graphical demands of modern games and applications.

The standard configuration offers 8GB of GDDR6 memory, which strikes a good balance for most gaming and professional workloads. This amount of VRAM is particularly beneficial for 1440p gaming and is becoming increasingly necessary for 4K gaming.

Memory Bandwidth

The memory bandwidth of the Radeon 760M is approximately 256 GB/s. This high bandwidth ensures that the GPU can quickly access and process data, which is essential for maintaining high frame rates in demanding scenarios.

Impact on Performance

The combination of GDDR6 memory and high bandwidth significantly impacts performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and games. The 8GB VRAM allows for smoother gameplay at higher resolutions and better performance in scenarios that require large texture loads.

3. Gaming Performance

Real-World Examples

In gaming benchmarks, the Radeon 760M delivers impressive performance across various titles. Here are some average FPS results:

- Call of Duty: Warzone: 1080p – 85 FPS, 1440p – 60 FPS

- Cyberpunk 2077: 1080p – 70 FPS (Medium settings), 1440p – 45 FPS

- The Witcher 3: 1080p – 90 FPS, 1440p – 65 FPS

These numbers indicate that the 760M can comfortably handle 1080p gaming at high settings and is also capable of 1440p gaming, albeit at medium settings in more demanding titles.

Support for Resolutions

The Radeon 760M excels at 1080p gaming but is also capable of 1440p. While it struggles with 4K gaming, it can still provide decent performance in less demanding titles at this resolution. The performance impact of ray tracing is significant; while the GPU supports it, enabling ray tracing will often lead to a notable drop in frame rates.

4. Professional Tasks

Video Editing

For video editing, the Radeon 760M performs well with software like Adobe Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve. Its GDDR6 memory aids in rendering and handling high-resolution footage, making it a suitable choice for semi-professional video editors.

3D Modeling

In 3D modeling applications such as Blender and Autodesk Maya, the 760M’s architecture allows for efficient rendering and manipulation of complex models. The card supports OpenCL, which enables better performance in rendering tasks compared to older architectures.

Scientific Calculations

While the AMD Radeon 760M is not primarily designed for scientific calculations, its OpenCL support allows for the execution of compute-intensive tasks. However, users requiring extensive computational power might want to consider dedicated compute GPUs.

5. Power Consumption and Thermal Design

TDP and Efficiency

The Thermal Design Power (TDP) of the Radeon 760M is around 150W. This moderate power requirement means that users can run the GPU without needing an overly robust power supply.

Cooling Recommendations

For optimal performance, it's recommended to use a cooling solution that can effectively dissipate heat. A good quality aftermarket GPU cooler or a well-ventilated case can help maintain lower temperatures, ensuring stable performance during long gaming or rendering sessions.

6. Comparison with Competitors

AMD Rival Models

In comparison with other AMD models, the Radeon 760M holds its ground against the Radeon RX 6600. While the RX 6600 offers slightly better performance, the 760M provides a more affordable option for gamers on a budget.

NVIDIA Alternatives

When compared to NVIDIA's offerings, the closest competitor is the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. The 760M tends to outperform the GTX 1660 Ti in most modern titles, especially when using AMD's FidelityFX technologies.

7. Practical Tips

Power Supply Recommendations

For the Radeon 760M, a power supply of at least 550W is recommended. Ensure that the power supply has sufficient PCIe power connectors to support the GPU.

Compatibility with Platforms

The 760M is compatible with both AMD and Intel platforms. However, for optimal performance, pairing it with a Ryzen processor can unleash the full potential of the card.

Driver Considerations

Keeping drivers up-to-date is crucial for maintaining performance and compatibility. AMD regularly releases driver updates that enhance performance in new titles and improve stability.

8. Pros and Cons

Pros

- Strong 1080p Performance: Great for gamers looking to play at high settings.

- Good Value: Offers competitive performance for its price.

- Efficient Architecture: Lower power consumption compared to older models.

- Support for FidelityFX: Enhances visual quality without significant performance costs.

Cons

- Limited 4K Performance: Struggles with 4K gaming in demanding titles.

- No Ray Tracing Support: Lacks the advanced ray tracing capabilities found in NVIDIA cards.

- Less Optimal for Compute Tasks: Not as strong as dedicated compute cards for scientific calculations.

9. Conclusion

The AMD Radeon 760M is an excellent choice for gamers looking for a reliable mid-range GPU. Its strong performance in 1080p gaming, combined with decent 1440p capabilities and efficient power consumption, makes it suitable for a wide range of users. While it may not excel in 4K gaming or advanced ray tracing, its value proposition and support for FidelityFX make it a compelling option in the current market.

Whether you are a casual gamer or a professional needing a reliable card for video editing and 3D modeling, the Radeon 760M is a solid investment that balances performance and affordability.

Basic

Label Name
AMD
Platform
Integrated
Launch Date
January 2023
Model Name
Radeon 760M
Generation
Navi III IGP
Base Clock
1500MHz
Boost Clock
2800MHz
Shading Units
?
The most fundamental processing unit is the Streaming Processor (SP), where specific instructions and tasks are executed. GPUs perform parallel computing, which means multiple SPs work simultaneously to process tasks.
384
Transistors
25,390 million
RT Cores
6
Compute Units
8
TMUs
?
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) serve as components of the GPU, which are capable of rotating, scaling, and distorting binary images, and then placing them as textures onto any plane of a given 3D model. This process is called texture mapping.
24
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
L2 Cache
2MB
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Foundry
TSMC
Process Size
4 nm
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TDP
15W

Memory Specifications

Memory Size
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
Memory Bus
?
The memory bus width refers to the number of bits of data that the video memory can transfer within a single clock cycle. The larger the bus width, the greater the amount of data that can be transmitted instantaneously, making it one of the crucial parameters of video memory. The memory bandwidth is calculated as: Memory Bandwidth = Memory Frequency x Memory Bus Width / 8. Therefore, when the memory frequencies are similar, the memory bus width will determine the size of the memory bandwidth.
System Shared
Memory Clock
SystemShared
Bandwidth
?
Memory bandwidth refers to the data transfer rate between the graphics chip and the video memory. It is measured in bytes per second, and the formula to calculate it is: memory bandwidth = working frequency × memory bus width / 8 bits.
System Dependent

Theoretical Performance

Pixel Rate
?
Pixel fill rate refers to the number of pixels a graphics processing unit (GPU) can render per second, measured in MPixels/s (million pixels per second) or GPixels/s (billion pixels per second). It is the most commonly used metric to evaluate the pixel processing performance of a graphics card.
44.80 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
?
Texture fill rate refers to the number of texture map elements (texels) that a GPU can map to pixels in a single second.
67.20 GTexel/s
FP16 (half)
?
An important metric for measuring GPU performance is floating-point computing capability. Half-precision floating-point numbers (16-bit) are used for applications like machine learning, where lower precision is acceptable. Single-precision floating-point numbers (32-bit) are used for common multimedia and graphics processing tasks, while double-precision floating-point numbers (64-bit) are required for scientific computing that demands a wide numeric range and high accuracy.
8.602 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
?
An important metric for measuring GPU performance is floating-point computing capability. Double-precision floating-point numbers (64-bit) are required for scientific computing that demands a wide numeric range and high accuracy, while single-precision floating-point numbers (32-bit) are used for common multimedia and graphics processing tasks. Half-precision floating-point numbers (16-bit) are used for applications like machine learning, where lower precision is acceptable.
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
?
An important metric for measuring GPU performance is floating-point computing capability. Single-precision floating-point numbers (32-bit) are used for common multimedia and graphics processing tasks, while double-precision floating-point numbers (64-bit) are required for scientific computing that demands a wide numeric range and high accuracy. Half-precision floating-point numbers (16-bit) are used for applications like machine learning, where lower precision is acceptable.
4.387 TFlops

Miscellaneous

Vulkan Version
?
Vulkan is a cross-platform graphics and compute API by Khronos Group, offering high performance and low CPU overhead. It lets developers control the GPU directly, reduces rendering overhead, and supports multi-threading and multi-core processors.
1.3
OpenCL Version
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
Power Connectors
None
ROPs
?
The Raster Operations Pipeline (ROPs) is primarily responsible for handling lighting and reflection calculations in games, as well as managing effects like anti-aliasing (AA), high resolution, smoke, and fire. The more demanding the anti-aliasing and lighting effects in a game, the higher the performance requirements for the ROPs; otherwise, it may result in a sharp drop in frame rate.
16
Shader Model
6.7

FP32 (float)

4.387 TFlops

3DMark Time Spy

2329

Blender

183

Compared to Other GPU

SiliconCat Rating

532
Ranks 532 among all GPU on our website
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 570 Mobile
AMD, December 2017
4.745 TFlops
Radeon RX 5500M
AMD, October 2019
4.63 TFlops
Radeon 760M
AMD, January 2023
4.387 TFlops
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
NVIDIA, January 2018
4.287 TFlops
Tesla K80
NVIDIA, November 2014
4.195 TFlops
3DMark Time Spy
Arc A550M
Intel, January 2022
5182
Radeon RX 570
AMD, April 2017
3874
Radeon 780M
AMD, January 2023
2755
Radeon 760M
AMD, January 2023
2329
GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
NVIDIA, March 2018
635
Blender
Arc A580
Intel, October 2023
1661
A2
NVIDIA, November 2021
883.68
Radeon RX 580 2048SP
AMD, October 2018
450
GeForce GTX 960
NVIDIA, January 2015
207
Radeon 760M
AMD, January 2023
183

Related GPU Comparisons